Search

Tom Allen

If at first you don't succeed, edit out your failures.

Category

U3:3.1 Organise self and work to meet deadlines and targets.

In camera effects production

In the first video me and my class mates we tried to make sunglasses appear in the hands

Screen Shot 2015-09-21 at 10.57.24 Screen Shot 2015-09-21 at 10.57.09

We tried to use a cut to try to make it seem that the glasses appeared in the hands.

Evaluations

1. Finished product:

  • Aesthetic qualities: Our video is very choppy and not very well edited. This is because we accidentally moved the actor’s hands down which meant we couldn’t make the shot stay in line.
  • Content: Our video’s content was that the actor wanted some sunglasses that he saw on his phone so he hit the side of the phone in order to get the glasses on off the phone.
  • Style: Our piece didn’t really have a style of our own as we took hey inspiration from Zach King (https://vine.co/Zach.King)
  • My team contribution: I acted as the camera man and also the editor, I found the camera heavier than I expected so I dipped it occasionally as it became uncomfortable.

2. Production process:

  • Technical competences: As it was my first time on Premiere Pro my first job was to try to get a grip on the technology.
  • Time management: We didn’t run over our time and we filmed the shot and quickly got on to editing.
  • Creative abilities: We tried to show as much creative ability in our piece but with limited options we had to use a single pair of sunglasses.

Blog Post 6 – Analysis

 

(https://youtu.be/p8KlrW-XTYc)

This is the first version I produced and it features the a sped up time lapse of the Bramall Lane and a sped up spinning logo of S.U.F.C. I used the spinning logo behind the player to highlight the player. The Text that comes in to the side is, in my opinion good, however the red in the text is not the red that S.U.F.C uses, so if I was to do the project again I would need to use their red to make the project consistent. The footage was quite short as there was not a lot of usable footage to make use of. If i was to do this again I would probably loop the end of the footage (where the player is standing still) in order to make the footage more around the 5 second mark.

(https://youtu.be/jOBAP2CmH3U)

This is the second version that i produced and it features a much slower time lapse of Bramall Lance and the log spinning twice in the top left hand corner. I moved the logo to the side to see if it stole attention from the main subject, however it seems to make the project look betters as it spreads attention across the whole screen rather than keeping it in one location. The text that come in from the left is much darker than the last iteration but is still not the colour that S.U.F.C uses.

Self evaluation

 

BBFC

 

The BBFC is the British Board of Film Classification, they handle the classification of films in order to “Protect the public, and especially children, from content which might raise harm risk”

(http://www.bbfc.co.uk/about-bbfc/our-mission)

The difference between a PG rating and a 15 rating is the amount of swearing, if there is discriminatory language and/ or behaviour or drug taking.

The Criminal Law: The Criminal Law is a law where the BBFC cannot pass any material likely to infringe the criminal law. This is heavily influenced by the Obscene Publications acts of 1959 and 1964, The Cinematograph Films (Animals) Act 1937, The Animal Welfare Act 2006 and The Protection of Children Act 1978.

The Video Recordings Act: Video works (including films, TV programmes and video games) which are supplied on a disc, tape or any other device capable of storing data electronically must be classified by the BBFC unless they fall within the definition of an exempted work.

When considering whether to award a classification certificate to a work, or whether to classify a work at a particular category, the BBFC is required by the Act to have special regard (among the other relevant factors) to the likelihood of works being viewed in the home, and to any harm that may be caused to potential viewers or, through their behaviour, to society by the manner in which the work deals with:

  • criminal behaviour
  • illegal drugs
  • violent behaviour or incidents
  • horrific behaviour or incidents
  • human sexual activity.

In considering these issues the BBFC has in mind the possible effect not only on children but also on other vulnerable people.

Race Relations Act: The Race Relations Act 1976, which was changed to the Race Relations (Amendment) Act 2000, places a legal obligation on public authorities to have due regard to the need to eliminate unlawful discrimination and to promote equality of opportunity and good relations between persons of different racial groups.

In 2004, Examiners discussed whether the Act was relevant during their deliberations after seeing the film, The Passion of the Christ, which some commentators accused of being anti-Semitic. The BBFC’s conclusion was that it was neither anti-Semitic nor indeed blasphemous.

Screen Shot 2016-02-01 at 13.17.07

My evaluation

Self evaluation

I was asked to produce a short film with the title, “The Meeting” my group settled on the idea of making a short crime film. It would be in the style of an action movie. We chose to do this as we believed it would be interesting to make and watch as no-one else in the class was doing anything similar.

My main job was audio recording, I recorded the speech, which I believe went well as, even though I had a few setbacks, I got managed to record and upload the recordings. The setbacks I were that I lost a scene’s audio however we decided that the scene wasn’t very good and didn’t fit in so we cut it from the final product. I also was partly in charge of prop research in which I decided that we needed prop guns and latex gloves as they would help sell the film as being more authentic.

I believe that I did well in coming up with an idea and recording the audio as the audio is timed to the music. It also fits the piece which set the tone for the more serious part of the product.

I was in charge of prop planning, research, script and was meant to be an actor, but I was too nervous. I believe that I could of done a lot more for my group as I felt as my role wasn’t important as a sound guy because I lost the audio. I did get quite a bit of good audio though.

I had to think of which props to use such as the guns, which were supplied by Tom Scott. I decided that we would only need guns, gloves as they we weren’t doing anything to active.

I recorded the audio using a marantz kit and a boom mic. The boom mic was lighter than I imagined and I found the marantz easy to use. We used shots like close ups and wide shots to show the characters in different ways. For instance, the first shot is a panning, close up with then changes to a tracked medium shot.

Peer evaluation

(Bex) Tom Allen: Tom Allen was in charge of Prop Planning, Research, Script, Actor.

I think Tom was successful with his research as he is interested in most of the props people use in films and games, with this being his interest he was able to give Tom Scott a list of research he achieved so Tom Scott was able to get the props we needed. Tom also came up with the whole idea of the heist ‘crime’ situation, which made the team blow up with creativity and ideas. Tom was suppose to act in the production however, Tom did the characters voice over before the audio got lost on the computer (this made him have to record Tom Scott instead).Tom received a few issues with the audio as it got lost on his computer twice, however Tom was able to recover this issue well by re-recording the audio and sounds effects and protected them by saving them to his USB. Tom and the rest of the group was in charge of the script, this was very successful as we were all able to create a creative and powerful script. Tom also operated the productions audio and not just the foley sound effects, through boom which came out successful and all the audio was usable (we barely had to re-record any of the scripts sound). Tom’s input to the group was good however I feel we should have given him another role to do as he didn’t feel he’d be as effective as an actor, Overall, I look forward to working with him again and feel that he has been a good member to the production team.

(Beth) Tom A was our sound recorder, and when he originally recorded the sound he forgot to upload it onto the Mac so we had to rerecord it in a sound booth and it didn’t sound as good as the original. He did work hard however, and had some good ideas. He was also in charge of Prop researching and planning, and although he did some research he was not particularly helpful, and the rest of the team had to step in a provide prop ideas and bring them into college for use.His creativity was brilliant when it came to deciding on the original plot.

(Tom Scott) Tom A: Tom was a somewhat productive member of the team and one of the main driving forces behind the ideas process, the heist idea was originally his idea and was the basis for our films plot. Toms role mainly consisted of being the boom pole operator and sound man overall. He put a lot of effort into his job and was also a great help in setting up the scenes, he also played a role in the film although it was a minor role it was still much appreciated and helped in moving along the production process. He remained professional throughout the process and was a good sound recording operator, he always remained consistent in his work and was a great asset to the team. His suggestions in all parts of the production process were imaginative and were always taken on board. There were times where he didn’t feel as though he wasn’t capable of doing a job or unmotivated such as doing the voiceover for the phone guy but I never doubted his capability nor his passion for the project. Overall he was a great team member and I would love to work with him again in future projects because of his passion for film and professionalism.

 

 

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑